Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthroposophy: a radical alternative view


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Anthroposophy: a radical alternative view

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:OR - this essay seems at heart to want to use the writings of one man to rebut another Wikipedia article ("When the above indications of Rudolf Steiner are understood in practice, it will then be clear that Anthroposophy is not, as the main Wikipedia entry suggests: a spiritual philosophy, but rather a human capacity latent in all human beings[...]") Nat Gertler (talk) 16:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Concur - though entirely well-meaning, it's more of a personal statement than an encyclopedia article. hgilbert (talk) 11:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

this is a personal essay through and through, not an encyclopedia article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.18.166 (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Entirely WP:OR, with no references. BlueRobe (talk) 09:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Adding this article to the log for the first time (as far as I can tell) on 20 September. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 21:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. OR personal essay. Kaldari (talk) 21:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as unwikified and unsourced original essay. When you see the subtitle "a radical alternative view," you know that there are POV axes being ground — which is not part of the Wikipedia mission, obviously. Carrite (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 23:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete a personal essay obviously— Chris! c / t 02:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.