Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Australian sentiment (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep --Jaranda(watz sup) 23:30, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Anti-Australian sentiment
No substantiative evidence that such a sentiment actually exists Jackk 02:19, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment this article survived this previous deletion debate.--cj | talk 03:34, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- cj | talk 03:34, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Cleanup, verify and possibly NPOv. Definite sentiment with Osama Bin Laden having a long entrenched anti-Australian attitude as did Dr Mahathir Mohammed of Malaysia so verifiable. Capitalistroadster 04:03, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, although Mahathir was more racist than specifically Anti-Australian.--cj | talk 04:26, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep IanBailey(talk) 09:30, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I voted to keep this in its previous debate. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 10:08, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep If Mahatir didn't speak anti-Australian sentiments, then I'll have to watch the aerial porcine formations. -LichYoshi 10:10, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Shouldn't have been renominated. CalJW 10:19, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per the arguments I made last time. Nominator should pay more attention to foreign affairs. Ambi 13:04, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Sarah Ewart 13:53, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I haven't checked to see if this article has changed much since nomination, but it looks like a great article. -- Chuq 08:17, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, on procedural grounds - I voted for deletion last time around, IIRC, but it survived that. No new reasons to delete and several of the old ones have been fixed, so this shouldn't have been renominated. --Calair 22:07, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, Although it needs references - perhaps Unreferenced?. Agnte 16:14, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep -- plenty of evidence. - Longhair 22:56, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Here's what I get for "Anti-Australian" specifically excluding Wikipedia.. It's certainly real in parts of the South Pacific and Indonesia. I'm not sure why sources aren't being used much.--T. Anthony 11:46, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - plenty of evidence, topical area. Zordrac 13:11, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - plenty of evidence, topical area. Zordrac 13:11, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.