Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Brazilian sentiment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. insufficient debate has taken place over the last three weeks to establish a consensus. No solid grounds for a relist per WP:RELIST (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Anti-Brazilian sentiment

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reviewed as a part of New Page Patrol. Not a distinct topic and not wp:notable because not covered in sources as such. By it's own description, this is just a by-editor collection of anything anti Brazilian exhibited by anybody. North8000 (talk) 12:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination and Brazil. Shellwood (talk) 12:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, I was able to find secondary coverage of anti-brazilian sentiment.

SailingInABathTub (talk) 23:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:36, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Those are instances of such sentiment, which does not address the reason for the AFD. North8000 (talk) 16:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The nomination states that the article is not notable because it is "not covered in sources as such". All three sources explicitly discuss anti-brazilian sentiment. Additionally the first portuguese source in this article discusses antibrasileirismo or 'anti-brazilianism'. SailingInABathTub (talk) 21:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.