Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Spam Research Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  k eep. - Mailer Diablo 00:55, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Anti-Spam Research Group

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Possibly non-notable. You decide. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 00:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems to rather easily pass WP:V. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 00:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Agree with Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?).  By the way, nice research  Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?).  Shoessss |  Chat  01:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. per Ten Pound Hammer.  James   Luftan  contribs 03:17, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable. Also participates in government programs to combat spam. Dbromage 03:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have heard of them; therefore they must be notable (just kidding!). I do trust the above links as giving notability, but the article itself is only vestigial at the moment. Whoever expands this will probably need to crawl through the archives of IETF mailing lists to see what they've actually done. Most of the above refs are from 2003. Following the progress of a standards committee is like watching paint dry, so it will take patience. If not much has happened lately, this could be merged into another article (an editorial decision, not an AfD decision). EdJohnston 04:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ten Pound Hammer and Dbromage. Maxamegalon2000 05:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Those CNN, Wired, USA Today etc. sources are adequate enough to pass WP:V. Spellcast 08:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable enough, verifiable enough. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.