Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Wikipedia 2: The Rise of the Latrines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Anti-Wikipedia 2: The Rise of the Latrines

 * Comment: Changing "proposed for deletion" to "articles for deletion" to see what the consensus is. (Boborok 19:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC))
 * Delete, unnotable. &mdash;Xezbeth 19:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Notability is a subjective measure and as such not for debate. (Boborok 20:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC))


 * Delete as NN. -- Grafikm_fr 19:47, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * A "satiric essay". Fails WP:NOT, WP:NOR.  No indication of notability.  Not proposing BJAODN.  Barno 19:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * "No original research" only applies to Wikipedia articles, and not the works the articles are about. (Boborok 20:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC))
 * Do you see any citations of coverage in peer-reviewed scholarly journals or mainstream media with fact-checkers? The only source in the article at this writing is the website with the anti-WP rant essay.  Yes, the essay is OR, but the article (one sentence plus one promotional link) is also OR, lacking any sources, regardless of whether it's vanity.  Who says it's satiric; who says it's "in the form of a scientific study about W.T."?  Barno 22:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * As if there were "peer-reviewed scholarly journals" of internet satire. Hits on Google Scholar (Boborok 23:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC))


 * Delete per Barno --Ed (Edgar181) 20:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Criticism of Wikipedia. (Boborok 20:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC))
 * Delete (Boborok 02:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC))


 * Delete per Barno. Henning Makholm 22:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is just silly. Danny Lilithborne 00:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Barno and perhaps give it a mention in Criticism of Wikipedia. Hbackman 02:29, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I added it to Criticism of Wikipedia. (Boborok 02:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC))


 * Delete per Barno. — [[Image:Flag_of_Ottawa%2C_Ontario.svg|20px]] [[Image:Flag of Ontario.svg|20px]] [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|20px]]  nath a  nrdotcom  ( T •  C  • W) 04:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If there was some way I could recommend revoking their degrees I would too. Fagstein 06:35, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Let's see, a website stub. About a "satirical" essay written by someone known only by initials. "Sociology stub". OUCH. I don't even have to reach for website notability criteria to tell whether or not this rewards an article of its own. Someone should delete this under WP:SNOW. I hate to see articles suffer while they're in AfD. On behalf of "society for ethical treatment of substubs" which I just invented a second ago, --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 20:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.