Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-car measure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Plenty of PoV, Plenty of claims, no sources at all. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 01:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Anti-car measure

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Completely unreferenced opinion piece. It is inherently biased, and I don't see any way it can be salvaged. It's worth mentioning that the IP user who removed the PROD (possibly the same person as the original contributor) has a history of edits like this.  L P  talk 19:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced original research (very original, I would add). My own theory is that traffic planning is done by idiots rather than by a group of people conspiring to get us to switch to public transit.  However, as with the ideas here, that's POV and is not based on anything in print.  If the idea -- that there is a group of people who have come up with "anti-car" measures that are "usually disguised as improvements to road safety or the environment" -- has been published in a book, magazine, etc., that would be a different matter. Mandsford (talk) 20:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is just ridiculous. I tried to suggest essay pieces should have CSD reasons, but no one agreed. It's awful this has to go through AFD. Pure trash. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 20:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I do a fair amount of new page patrol, and I certainly share your frustration with people using Wikipedia to push their opinions. However, I think a CSD criterion for that would be inappropriate for most of the reasons people brought up on that discussion. -- L  P  talk 21:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant POV piece -- Boing!   said Zebedee  21:24, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourced POV piece, nothing even to establish this as a term. Hairhorn (talk) 21:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: POV essay. Joe Chill (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Blatant POV. -- doorautomatica   (talk)  06:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.