Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-parent crush


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Anti-parent crush
This article is unsourced Original research bordering on nonsense. Created by a user who is now on indef block for vandalism. Delete.--Isotope23 14:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unheard-of concept outside of this article. Azate 15:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per nom. Linuxaurus 15:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete apparent original research. No Google hits or Google Books hits to back this up. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - very insightful commentary. - Femmina 19:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It may be insightful, but it is still unsourced Original research.--Isotope23 20:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. One for the crusher. --Folantin 22:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Without citation, we have to assume it's something made up in school one day -Markeer 00:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - the shocking state of this article has completely traumatized me. I need my mummy!!! Moreschi 21:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strongest Possible Delete Made up term, original non-research. Basically garbage. Chris Buckey 05:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - wft is this about? Woodgreener--86.135.73.113 19:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.