Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-pokemon

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to delete the article. --Canderson7 00:26, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Anti-pokemon
Anti-Pokemon is an orphan article written about a non existing word/name (Gibberish phrase) which is also misspelled. The content of the article does not explain the term "Anti-Pokemon" and has been made by just guessing wiki markup, for example creating headlines by writing bold text followed by a horizontal line (which users are told to use sparingly) without previewing causing gibberish like "Italic textAntiItalic text". See Pokémon theme music also. --Shreddy 20:34, 29 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Stupidest article I've ever read. Love, Gold Stur 20:40, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Gold Stur has led a sheltered life if that's the stupidest article thy've ever read - wait till I get finished wikifying our corporate strategic plan :-) Dlyons493 10:25, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I would counter your reasons, Shreddy. When someone goes to Wikipedia, they want to be able to see info on all types of sources. Also, there is an extensive issue on "Pokemon", so everyone would know what that meant. Plus, horizontal lines are used sparingly (just twice). "Use Sparingly" doesn't mean "never use". Finally, Anti-Pokemon is not spelled wrong, and it is not gibberish, either. Sure hope no one makes the grave mistake of deleting this page. --Scyther-Mantis 12:34, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete What is the point of this article, beside the fact its a hoax? Emphasis on hoax. "Anti-Pokemon" is gibberish as well, not to mention provacative. This should be a candidate for speedy deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.189.165.27 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete It's pointless and fannish and doesn't belong in Wikipedia. Any valuable information it might have could easily be contained within the Pokemon and/or flaming articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mumblingmynah (talk • contribs) 23:52, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now.  No opinion. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete anything that reaches a certain point of popularity will eventually attract a hate site or two... there's also anti-Harry Potter sites and anti-Star Wars sites. These sites are usually only semi-serious and never really have any impact on anything.  At best, this topic might warrant a sentence in the main Pokemon article, but doesn't need one of its own. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  11:51, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * "Because a cartoon and the internet are SERIOUS BUSINESS!" Great, this is so stupid I can't even make fun of it. Wikachu, Delete Attack!. -- Last Malthusian 15:59, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, which I guess makes me anti-anti-Pokemon. Anyway, a minor article on a minor movement that should be mentioned in the Pokemon article if it were worth mentioning, which it is not. Lord Bob 19:02, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Pokemon and duck the fireworks delete. --Carnildo 23:29, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete The topic can be discussed in better depth in the Pokémon article - in fact, there is already a section in that article which discusses crticisms of Pokémon. A.K.R. 11:47, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gibberish. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 04:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.