Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti Molestation Device For Women


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Anti Molestation Device For Women

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has been Speedily deleted in the past and has reappeared ChiragPatnaik (talk) 07:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 27.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  07:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment This is a substantially rewritten version of the previously deleted article. I've rewritten it based on the two sources that just about passed WP:RS (although I'm on the fence with the IBN one); everything else seemed to be a rehash of the same IGNITE press release. The second paragraph in the "Mechanism" section is unsourced, but I left it in (after rephrasing for simplicity) because it does describe a plausible method by which the device could measure nerve impulse rate. I think the two sources provided suffice for WP:GNG, but I'm not totally convinced, hence my abstention from !voting. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 08:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The two reliable sources also seem to be a rehash of the IGNITE release. While I love celebrating innovation, especially by children, I am not convinced about the notability of this device. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 13:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, a kid's invention that won an invention contest, but is not yet in production - not yet notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, still under development, and only covered by a news story. See WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOT. ZZArch  talk to me 11:30, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete,I fail to understand why should this article be deleted. Innovations deserve a Wikipedia entry. If this was a developed product, you would have said Wikipedia doesn't promote products. If this is an innovation, you think it doesn't deserve an article. Anything which tries to bring a change in our society deserves an article even if it is an award winning innovation. I can name over 50 Wiki articles on innovations, ideas not yet made into products. So DO NOT DELETE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.56.229.196 (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the source seem unreliable, given inconsistencies in the way the device is explained (does it detect nerve impulses or hormones, for example? Does the speed of nerve impulses really change?) Also I don't think detecting sexual assault is the difficult part of the problem, so I'd be surprised if this device went anywhere.  Manu Chopra himself may be notable for winning the competition, but that is a different issue. -- 202.124.73.9 (talk) 06:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete,When we posted the original research, you said Wikipedia is not the place for original research so we removed the research. When we explained the device in detail, you called it too long and edited it. Now we have edited it, you call it not notable. We have the entire research and feasibility studies of the project waiting to present it to the community. So DO NOT DELETE.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.56.229.196 (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.177.202.52 (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.