Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti North Korean Sentiment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost  Singu  larity  08:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Anti North Korean Sentiment

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Badly written, no references, and chock-full of original research. If there's a legitimate article to be written on the subject, this is not it. PC78 01:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The article is WP:OR and provides no WP:RS. --Evb-wiki 01:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. In addition to the problems cited above, the article has severe problems with bias. --Metropolitan90 03:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - This should be briefly mentioned in the Racial segregation in the United States, because it doesnt have the notability or references to stand on its own Corpx 04:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure about that. There is nothing in this article about North Koreans being subjected to segregation in the United States. --Metropolitan90 04:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above (except the "racial segregation" argument). Drivel. --Folantin 08:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per pure WP:OR. It's also awfully written and the author is a vandal. --Targeman 15:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete You'd need a pot of alphabet soup to detail the problems with this article--WP:NPOV, WP:SOAP, WP:OR, etc. Pity there isn't a speedy for stuff like this.  Blueboy96 19:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This article is poorly written, even if one overlooks the fact that English is a second language for the author. In other words, even if it was on 위키백과, and I could understand it in Korean, it would be poorly written because of its rambling style and POV.  You could polish it all day and it wouldn't shine. Mandsford 22:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, although in fairness it is merely an extreme example of the Anti-foo sentiment/Criticism of.../Allegations of... articles. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 23:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - along with every other "Anti-X Sentiment". This is only getting the chop because it's barely written in English. The rest should go too. Moreschi Talk 15:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.