Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti shi'ism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ged UK  13:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Anti shi'ism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unsupported piece of POV writing. A probable magnet for edit wars and POV clashes (see recent edits). Would need to be totally rewritten to be encyclopedic. Not quite an attack page speedy in my view, but... There might possibly be a valid and useful article on this topic, but this text isn't it -- this isn't any part of such an article or even a start on one. DES (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom, unless totally rewritten to comply with policies, particularly WP:NPOV. DES (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry for messing with you, but I'm striking your comment because you are the nominator. Usually, the nominator's nomination is a good enough way to tell people you want this article deleted, so there is no need to put in a separate !vote. It's quite confusing, too. Again, sorry for this! Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:33, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I sometimes nominate procedurally, articles about which i am neutral. Therefore, I always include a separate comment with a !vote after my nomination. Also, when I want to indicate an acceptable alternative such as redirection, i do so in the added comment. It also lets the closer simply look through the bolded comments. I find such helpful when i close AfDs. A strike out implies that i have changed my views, which i have not here. Please do not so adjust my comments in future. DES (talk) 18:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete the material currently present. I think that the topic could probably support an article (although I'm not persuaded it would be under this name), but I have absolutely no concerns about the need to preserve the current material from a licensing perspective; what is here now is really not compatible with a NPOV Wikipedia article as the community understands it.  Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Squeamish. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. 21:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.