Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antipope Paschal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 00:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Antipope Paschal
The article is exceedingly short and the only information provided that is not in the title is a 6 word unsourced statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dddstone (talk • contribs) 12:51, 17 January 2007
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep its a stub in a valid series Madmedea 16:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep provided that sources are cited and that it is expanded a bit. The article deserves to be worked on before it is deleted. Leebo 86 18:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. As this article is an unverified and unsourced statement, the nominator certainly has reason to put this up for AfD; however, the article is clearly a stub and it should not be difficult to remedy either of the defects. Agent 86 18:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep of course  Johnbod 23:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. As madmedea mentioned, Antipopes are very valid historic topics, especially so early in Roman Catholic history as this one wss.  --Oakshade 06:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. --MaNeMeBasat 17:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.