Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antisemitism in the United States


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:SNOW - Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  19:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Antisemitism in the United States

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete: Full of original research. The information, which are properly sourced, can be merged in the article Antisemitism. This region based article is not notable and do not deserve for a separate encyclopedic entry.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 20:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep The article is amply sourced. Sources can be readily found for any unsourced statements. The reason this article was spun off from Antisemitism is because that article was overly long. Merging it would just recreate that problem. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 20:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - if it can be properly sourced, it might be worth keeping. As it stands, I concur with Otolemur crassicaudatus that it's full of original research. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 20:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, put a tag rather than asking AfD-- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 21:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:OR is a WP:PROBLEM requiring cleanup, not deletion. While this article is not heavily sourced, much of this article links to other articles which seem to have sources for antisemitism, so this looks largely verifiable. / edg ☺ ☭ 21:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The topic is notable, but lacks good sources and borderline WP:OR. However, deletion isn't a good way to deal with this. Cleanup is. Chris!  c t 03:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, clearly sourced (References section); what it lacks are inline citations. Editors must understand that Wikipedia enhancements commonly used in 2008 were not available several years ago. Before 2006 or so there were Featured Articles that didn't have a single inline citation. --Dhartung | Talk 04:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Certainly a notable topic. Needs some cleanup. Maxamegalon2000 05:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Speedy keep per Dhartung.  It's a well-referenced article, it just likes ref tags. Celarnor (talk) 12:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Antisemitism in the U.S. has a long scholarly history. It is different from antisemitism in Eastern Europe. Perfectly appropriate topic for a stand-alone article. POV or OR problems? Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit, so go and fix it. Edison (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.