Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antivirus pro 2009


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to WinFixer.  MBisanz  talk 04:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Antivirus pro 2009

 * – (View AfD)

Based on the following web search: the subject of this article appears to lack significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject, and consequently doesn't comply with notability guideline. PhilKnight (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --GreyCat (talk) 00:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: No reliable sources that show notability per WP:NOTABILITY. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 00:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect: per below. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 09:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to WinFixer as one of many variations of this virus-infecting racket under yet another shiny new name; this would be a plausible redirect.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect as an alternative name to a rogue software per User:Mrschimpf.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to winfixer or smitfraud or rogue software. Definitely a plausible search term (I've cleaned this crap off at least 20 computer this month), but it really doesn't warrant it's own article. Grandmartin11 (talk) 16:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rogue software unless some decent sources can be provided. It's certainly a widespread piece of crapware (it's suckered more than a few people I know) that's a plausible search term, but it doesn't look like there's been much mention of it in reliable sources to allow a verifiable article to be produced. ~ mazca  t 18:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.