Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoaneta Kyuchukova (Antoinette)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 09:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Antoaneta Kyuchukova (Antoinette)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This was originally tagged as a speedy, but then it started to look a little better, so I prodded it instead. The prod was then removed, and so I am bringing it here. I am just not convinced that being head of a student union confers notability- there are a few web sources, but they all constitute blogs, and are not third party anyway. Delete from me. J Milburn 10:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This is not the sort of article where truly independent references can be expected--the most that would be found would by Oxford student publications. Probably almost all will be blogs. DGG 01:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Then surely, they are non notable, unless notability is automatically conveyed by such a thing? J Milburn 12:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. --DMG413 23:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 06:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; sooner or later "the first student to be President of " ceases to be notable enough for coverage in reliable sources. &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-10 07:01Z 
 * Delete as non-notable and lacking reliable sources. --RaiderAspect 12:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Just augment reasons for notability and provide more sources.  Sincerely, --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 17:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - the point is that there won't be independent sources of such a non-notable person. Feeeshboy 01:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Until she graduates and does something notable, she will not be. But this will then be a factor in her bio.DGG 02:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.