Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antobie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Antobie

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a "nutritional supplement" purported to aid in weight loss, makes inflated claims with absolutely no backing, and hasn't received any independent coverage. In fact this article is adspam. Looie496 (talk) 23:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete or fix :-) A chemical with a CAS number is notable, but the text is an obvious copy/paste from some web source. If someone is willing to make it into an article (it is easy, but I'm not up to it) - fine. If not, then speedy delete. Materialscientist (talk) 09:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * fix or wp:incubate seems notable, but article is just one big advert UltraMagnusspeak 13:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. This may be a duplicate of Orlistat under a different brand name. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree, copy of Orlistat and hence can be deleted! --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

*Delete and redirect to generic name. --UltraMagnusspeak 11:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to generic name. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou for your patience sincerely Tim      —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.144.154 (talk) 04:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * To whom it may concern I am the brand manager for Mayfair pharmaceuticals the IP owners of antobie soclormag. Our mission statement is to help cure the obesity epidemic very honestly. Obesity is now every developed countries most serious public health challenge costing tax payers multi millions in public health care and its increasing. We have enlisted one of our IT managers to develop this wikipedia article with the aim of furthering our good mission. This is the first time he has created a wikipedia article and we can see that he has put some Xenical data down as our data which is an honest mistake. Please give him reasonable time to tidy this article up. There will be no unproveable inflated claims in this article. Antobie has been developed from clincal studies on fasting and in particular  Duncan, C. et al,' Intermittent fasts in the correction and control of intractable obesity' American Journal of Medical Science 245:515-52.
 * As the comment above indicates, "Antobie" is probably not the same thing as orlistat. In fact there is no verifiable information whatsover about what Antobie is, so a redirect would not be appropriate at this time. Looie496 (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * well, the article lists the same CAS number, however, if the above comment is correct and the number in the article is incorrect then I suggest that this article be userfied until the correct information can be added and sourced. also if the article is correct and it is not orlistat then it should be moved to its generic name Soclormag --UltraMagnus</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="color:red;background-color:black;">speak</SPAN> 17:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment The other issue here is that the is nothing on google scholar for either antobie or soclormag <SPAN STYLE="background-color: black; color: Red">Ultra<SPAN STYLE="color: #0079e0">Magnus</SPAN></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="color:red;background-color:black;">speak</SPAN> 17:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete this says exactly what it is, it just another multipill containing a load of unproven herbal remedies masquerading as something scientific --<SPAN STYLE="background-color: black; color: Red">Ultra<SPAN STYLE="color: #0079e0">Magnus</SPAN></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="color:red;background-color:black;">speak</SPAN> 17:47, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and userfy if requested. As written the article feels like an advert, and search finds no mention in RS. This may change. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 05:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources about this product. -- Whpq (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No coverage, and the 'article' is not even an article. No redirect without a reliable source confirming that this is the same as some other product. <b class="Unicode">r ʨ anaɢ</b> talk/contribs 14:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: The article under discussion here has been rescue flagged by an editor for review by the Article Rescue Squadron.


 * Delete - no references, no Ghits, no categories, no sources → no article. Although I am amused that the same editor who added the tag to the article weighed in here as "strong delete." <span style='font:bold 1.0em "Apple Garamond","Adobe Garamond Pro",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'>Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 22:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.