Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoine Adrien


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 04:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Antoine Adrien

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, notability is not clearly stated, only ref is notification of his death. Jcmcc450 (talk) 19:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep there are additional sources now, and his importance is obvious from the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, article has been improved since nomination. (Side note: is there a template for participants in these editathon events to tag the article talk page with? Seems like a lot of them get created on good topics, but are unfinished or clumsily referenced and end up at AfD when they mostly just need polishing.) Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, for the same reasons stated above. Savvyjack23 (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Looks notable to me. Depending on its size the nationla head of an Order might be regarded as equivalent to a bishop, who would automatically be notable (except in finge denominations).  Peterkingiron (talk) 13:32, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.