Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Christodoulou


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Anton Christodoulou

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non notable, created by subject apparently, no evidence of any notability in any of the references Justinc (talk) 13:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 20:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 20:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 20:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment I've just ploughed through the first 15 references looking for instances of "Christodoulou" — there were none on most of the referenced pages, and the remaining pages were inaccessible for one reason or another.--A bit iffy (talk) 21:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I checked all of the source, as per the above, and found that six mentioned this guy. The problem being that they simply quote him as being CTO of a non-notable company, which doesn't establish notability.  Nik the  stoned  09:32, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete After some Googling I cannot find anything that indicates why he's notable.—A bit iffy (talk) 10:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: After screening >200 Google-hits: nothing substantial. -- Dewritech (talk)  11:03, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Dewritech.  →TSU tp* 21:55, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete agreed per User:Dewritech and above --  Ð ℬig  XЯaɣ  08:14, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.