Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Loeb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator for reasons given below. (NAC) Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 05:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Anton Loeb

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is a claim of notability for this person which could very well be valid. That being said, this fails WP:V miserably. Google turns up a few trivial mentions and not much else. The author's request "if you know anything about Loeb, please share the information" under the career heading is what does it for me. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 21:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve a quick check reveals that his book illustrations received glowing reviews. And that he illustrated many books and movies.  Admittedly, the article as it stands is very poor quality.Historicist (talk) 22:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Historicist

Slow down a bit i've only just started the page - I'm not sure why you're so keen to stop a thing before it starts - the world wont end. Make your mind up and I'll wait until you do as I'm in no mood to waste my time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob247 (talk • contribs) 18:20, November 5, 2008


 * Dear Mr Senseless, Since the user who put up this page is new to Wikipedia. And since, as you say, the subject is apparently notable.  Perhaps you could consider taking down the AFD and posting on the new user's page some advice about how to compose an article.Historicist (talk) 23:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Historicist


 * Keep. A Google Book search turns up numerous results. Really doesn't pass WP:BIO, but because of WP:BK and the fact that he is a fairly prolific illustrator, I'll vote keep. D ARTH P ANDA duel 01:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Though hardly passing many criteria, as the above user mentioned a book search shows multiple sources mentioning this man. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 02:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.