Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Rayne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Suzerain (video game). Owen&times; &#9742;  12:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Anton Rayne

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Redirect undone. Zero indication of notability. No coverage by any reliable sources. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Nominating this article for deletion has been compared to nazism. That's Godwin's law for you. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * I saw that you nominated me for the deletion of my post about a video game character named Anton Rayne. We cannot have coverage of too many sources when the character is only text-based. I did an undone redirect since I find it unfair that the character cannot have a wiki. The source used was mostly from the game's codex (which you can read in-game this is just an online version) and their developers so it is a reliable source, site from Torpor Games themselves(https://codex.torporgames.com/). All information on the character is really what games tell you about him and nothing added more. I really find it unfair since Wikipedia is supposed to be a dictionary of everything not just important characters. This character is a community loved one as are all others. I saw the complaints and comparisons to nazism. I of course dont justify it, it is probably a "Suzerain" fan like me.
 * I am looking foward to a response, Andrew(AntonRad) AntonRad (talk) 14:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Who is "we"? Oaktree b (talk) 15:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Community reception towards a character is generally irrelevant on Wikipedia, as we are not a fandom site. Video game characters (or anything, for that matter) generally only get articles if there is significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. I understand if you might be frustrated or find it unfair that your article was nominated for deletion, but this has been the widely accepted standard for a long time. See WP:GNG. λ Negative  MP1  16:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * I agree we need to look at the characters objectively and writing Anton like that needs info mostly from the games codex which i did, but i struggle to understand that Anton Rayne was mentioned in suzerain video game wiki and its not ok to write a short article about the games protagonist?
 * Best, Andrew AntonRad (talk) 18:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Suzerain (video game): Redirect to the game, I don't find critical discussion of the character in any media. Oaktree b (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * I appreciate you concern about redirection and the characters media popularity, but this was made just for those who did read Suzerain video game article to click on Anton Rayne and find out about him with more information about the games protagonist, but thanks for the comment
 * Best, Andrew AntonRad (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect per the nominator. The article creator seems to completely misunderstand what an average article for a video game character is supposed to be, and that Wikipedia is not a fandom site. Seeing the nomination get compared to Nazism made my day, though. λ Negative  MP1  16:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * I hope i didnt do too bad to be honest. I didnt want it to be seen as a fandom page, as i wanted it to be mostly from games codex. Anton Rayne is mentioned in Suzerain wiki page and i thought it would be good to create one for the protagonist.
 * Best, Andrew AntonRad (talk) 17:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect: Nonsense article. No indication of notability at all. Mostly copied from https://suzerain.fandom.com/wiki/Anton_Rayne; the rest was obviously AI-generated.  C F A   💬  16:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * thank you for the comment. You are not right in the first part its not mostly copied from https://suzerain.fandom.com/wiki/Anton_Rayne since that is not that much of a reliable source, side from the characters codex, whats mostly copied from is the characters codex in game which can be found on Torpors website! As for this the "rest was obviously AI-generated" AI doesnt even know to write about Suzerain i think, but i ll give it to ya the section for Antons policies really looks AI.
 * Best, Andrew. AntonRad (talk) 17:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment Nomination fails BEFORE; a check of Google News shows a piece in PC Gamer with an in-depth review of the game explaining this character. There are other hits, not an overwhelming number and some of them look iffy, but clearly not zero easy-to-find RS coverage. We know from Commander Shepard that it's possible to write an article about the role a player assumes in an RPG game, so really, the proper assertion here should be that there's not enough to cover about Rayne as a separate character article, aside from the game, not that no coverage exists. Jclemens (talk) 17:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * i appreciate your honesty and i do agree to you to some point. Since it Anton Rayne is mentioned in suzerain wiki article i think it was ok to make one about him. There's not enough to cover about Rayne as a separate character article, which is true to be fair but that's exactly why i wrote it from the players perspective, since player does everything Anton does in Suzerain.
 * Best, Andrew AntonRad (talk) 17:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Suzerain (video game) - What sources there are specifically on this character are not enough to justify a split from the main topic of the game. The source found by Jclemens can be added to the main game article, which needs to have its reception section beefed up, but nothing from this current article should be merged, as it is devoid of any reliable, secondary sources actually supporting any of it. Rorshacma (talk) 06:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * i somewhat agree but we shouldn't split the topic of the game just at least make it so this article or a brief article is present at suzerain(video-game)wiki page.
 * Best, Andrew AntonRad (talk) 14:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect The article itself smacks of ChatGPT, and fails WP:NOT even before we get to whether it's notable (which it probably isn't). Please "be better" when contributing articles (and no response is necessary to this, I will not be swayed either way). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey man, i know you said not to respond but this was my first article every i will try to do better
 * Best, Andrew AntonRad (talk) 10:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect per all. I hope that the article creator tries to learn more about Wikipedia. Where other fan wikis are based on fan interpretation of works, Wikipedia articles are built from reliable sources, like journalists and book authors. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.