Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonela Roccuzzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I don't think 18 days is necessarily too short to re-open a discussion, but as has been pointed out by numerous participants, the subject matter has not changed substantially since then. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscmscrutinize, talk 20:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Antonela Roccuzzo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

only known for her marriage to a footballer. Recommend redirect to Lionel Messi FMSky (talk) 14:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FMSky (talk) 14:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Previous AFD closed 18 days ago. Suriname0 (talk) 14:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - Previous AFD here under a name misspelling: Articles for deletion/Antonella Roccuzzo Suriname0 (talk) 14:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: Was kept at the last vote, I can't see that notability has changed in the last month. Famous for being with a famous person I suppose, coverage is there. I wouldn't consider her "notable", but my opinions aren't what we use to establish notability in wiki. GNG is met. Oaktree b (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fashion, Football, Internet,  and Argentina. Suriname0 (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per previous AFD. GiantSnowman 13:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep She is written about in a fair bit of tabloid, although wikipedia is against such media that does not discount it. There will be stronger sources that can go in the article, the article could look better, it's not very well written or a great read. Govvy (talk) 13:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per above. Clearly notable figure with many sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 08:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per recent AFD.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.