Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Dennard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Antonio Dennard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An American football player that plays cornerback. He has not played a regular season game or is on an active roster. Played college at an NAIA school. Has been Proded, deleted and recreated hours after deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 01:40, 25 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per long-standing consensus that making an NFL practice squad is not sufficient to clear the low, low, low bar we have set for notability for professional athletes. Carrite (talk) 05:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obviously doesn't pass WP:ATHLETE, and there's no solid evidence that he passes WP:BIO or any of the other specialised notability guidelines.  Nyttend (talk) 06:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ATHLETE. Qworty (talk) 01:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete A college football player can also qualify regardless of whether he plays pro ball if he has been the subject of non-trivial coverage in mainstream media sources.  In this case, I don't find any such non-trivial coverage of Dennard's college career. Cbl62 (talk) 22:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete only passing mention in a few news articles, nothing of substance. If he makes the pro cut and plays, that's a different story.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:23, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cbl62 and Paulmcdonald -- no presumption of notability per WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:NCOLLATH; insufficient independent media coverage of substantial nature to satisfy general notability standard of WP:GNG. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:48, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.