Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Peña


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep.  Soxred  93  04:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Antonio Peña

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A wrestling promoter of dubious notability. The one cited source does not give the impression of being particularly reliable or providing substantial coverage, and Google provides results about unrelated people.  Sandstein  19:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Per WP:ATHLETE if a person competed in a fully professional league they are notable. --Pinkkeith (talk) 21:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Question Did he ever compete? there's a difference between a competitor and a promoter. DGG (talk) 04:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't know if he ever competed but he was the promoter of Mexico's second largest promotion. He is notable, this article needs tidying. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note that WP:ATHLETE presumes that competitors in a professional league are notable, not their promoters, even if whatever it is he promotes is indeed a fully professional league.  Sandstein   05:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. A-Dust (talk) 00:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * AfD is not a vote.  Sandstein   05:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - the subject has not competed as a professional wrestler so WP:ATHLETE, cited above, does not apply. A single mention in the wrestling alamanac is not sufficient to meet WP:BIO. TerriersFan (talk) 02:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Some clearly unreliable sources I saw said that he was a competitor in the 1970s. I don't know this genre well enough to identify reliable sources, but I can tell that forums are unreliable sources...  So I offer this data point, but no opinion.  GRBerry 19:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.