Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Roberts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  scope_creep Talk  00:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Antonio Roberts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable. What sources are available are name drops. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Not independent or in-depth  scope_creep Talk  17:56, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The article is terrible, a resume stub, and more than half the sources need to be thrown out--primary, casual mentions, etc. But he's listed and gets a few sentences in that Oxford Handbook, and that should tip him over the edge. I'm going with weak keep. Drmies (talk) 20:48, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:31, 23 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes substantial pruning of sources is needed, but recent additions have established notability. The article just needs time and effort for improvements. keep Yaxu (talk) 22:47, 23 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, on the weak side, as above. The Oxford Handbook of Algorithmic Music has a solid paragraph. He's quoted bythe British Library blog here. The Times mentions him here but I cannot get past the paywall to see in what depth. Minor coverage in MixMag. There are a few others, which overall mean he's slightly notable.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Well spotted, well done. Withdrawn.  scope_creep Talk  00:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.