Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Toro Castro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No consensus but deleting for WP:BLP concerns. v/r - TP 01:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Antonio Toro Castro

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Simply not notable for his own article - a name on a list Off2riorob (talk) 14:16, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep There is a lot of sources that you can find but it is easy to translate. The link is http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#hl=en&q=%22Antonio+Toro+Castro%22&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=1238l1238l0l1667l1l1l0l0l0l0l170l170l0.1l1l0&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=dcb1ab7018e0fb92&biw=1440&bih=717 -- Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

It also's mention from the Spanish version Wikipedia http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Toro. -- Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 14:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Please cite at least one reliable source that says he was convicted of the bombings. Otherwise, your comments will have to be removed as BLP violations. The Spanish Wikipedia article has only ONE source, and it's a primary source, which at least on the English Wikipedia, cannot be used for such an allegation in the article. According to the NYT, he was acquitted . As far as I can tell from some of the Spanish sources, Castro was convicted of drug trafficking, not of the bombings themselves.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. As far as I can tell (and I'm having trouble with the sources), the only thing he's "notable" for is being charged and acquitted of a crime in connection with a notable event. His inclusion in another Wikipedia is not a justification for keeping him here. Perhaps he should be deleted there, too, but that's not my province.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * keep &mdash; there is plenty of coverage even from the find sources link above. you can get even more if you change it to "antonio toro" (due to peculiarities of spanish names) like this.  the coverage spans at least four years and appears in major newspapers in at least english and spanish.  clearly meets gng. &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 00:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * That is 10 hits and not only about him. Does not meet WP:PERP and WP:CRIME, a clear delete. - DonCalo (talk) 22:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Not 10 hits, but 2,810. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, can be dealt with in the article about the 2004 Madrid train bombings. - DonCalo (talk) 17:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - plenty of coverage, reliable sourcing. Its a keeper.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Whats needed here is additional sources and expanded information. not deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * He is not even important enough to be mentioned in the article on the 2004 Madrid train bombings. This one sentence can be included there. A clear case for deletion. - DonCalo (talk) 22:22, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete huge WP:BLP concerns. he was acquitted by a court. i don't think it's necessary that he have an article when found innocent by a court. LibStar (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment It should be merged into an article such as redirect or something. How every it will be part of the article -- Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:22, 10 September 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete. Clear case of WP:BLP1E, and especially given the nature of what the subject is even partially notable for, we should err on the side of privacy.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment We must get some text from the Spanish Version Wikipedia. That will make it simple. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:11, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Media coverage not enough for lasting notability or impact, see WP:109PAPERS. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to 2004 Madrid train bombings or 2004 Madrid train bombings suspects, as all the press coverage is regarding the bombings. He was acquitted at first, and an appeal was made, by which he was sentenced to four years for possession and traffic of explosives, but it was dismissed, as with the original sentencing, that he had provided the explosives for the bombings in specific. In such context and with so little content, I don't think an article is appropriate, following WP:BLP1E and WP:PERP — frankie (talk) 17:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * That would be really easy becuase it doesn't confict about up to date information. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:02, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.