Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonis Angastiniotis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Antonis Angastiniotis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No independent citations. Nipsonanomhmata (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I did some searching, and it looks like most of the info on Angastiniotis is self-published. I can't find enough sources to satisfy the WP:GNG. Angryapathy (talk) 18:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Ditto above.LedRush (talk) 18:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's a few hits on GNews, so he's not totally unknown (not enough for substantial coverage though), but even if someone does manage to show notability, Wikipedia articles are not soapboxes for the subjects of the articles to record their views. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 19:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Strange pastiche of an article that fails to satisfy WP:AUTHOR or WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Iff the stuff in the article can be sourced reliably, then he squeaks past minimum notability criteria - and even then, the article is still crammed full of copyvio. Delete unless it can be salvaged, with no prejudice against subsequent recreation if it can be done properly. DS (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.