Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antony Melck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 09:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Antony Melck
Article talks about a career academic who was on a number of committees, but does not address WP:BIO, I think. ben 11:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't have any claims to notability, it is also a vanity article. --Porqin 12:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Vice Chancellor and Principal of University of South Africa (Unisa) .  Needs editing though.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as above, although he is the former Vice Chancellor, but still notable enough. --BrownHairedGirl 12:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:BIO for lacking multiple non-trivial articles by third parties - he's quoted in a few papers but nothing is written about him per se; only 94 distinct Ghits for "antony melck". He's co-authored a book, but this does not automatically lend to notability, and there's nothing I can find to show the book itself meets notability for WP:BK, i.e., adopted as a textbook, adapted for a major motion picture, etc.  That he was a vice chancellor and principal of Univeristy of South Africa unfortunately are not factors to meeting WP guidelines and policies. Tychocat 21:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - also, original writer is Amelck, so the article appears to be vanity. Tychocat 21:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability is not really established, and it is unverifiable. And vanity. --  Aguerriero  ( talk ) 04:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Former head of a significant university. An encyclopedicly notable individual. Zaxem 09:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.