Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antony Salvestine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Antony Salvestine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparent hoax. See also Nigel Dawson, and note that I deleted Tony Catherton at BLPPROD and it appears entirely unsourcable as well. j⚛e deckertalk 04:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Article just like the Nigel Dawson article (by the same editor, HyperDrive9) is a blatant hoax. Description of the individual is very cliche, fitting a fake bio. No sources given. Filmography and awards which are easy to verify are completely bogus.  Cowlibob (talk) 14:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete (and with haste) per nom and per Cowlibob above. If  the subject  had indeed "received nominations for two Oscar Awards, a Golden Globe Award and a Screen Actors Guild Award", it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect at least a smattering of coverage somewhere. Blatant hoax.  FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 02:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is either a hoax, or is over-inflating the role of this person (on the off change they are real). I looked at our article for one of the claimed films with a "lead role" and he did not show up in the 12 listed cast members.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, searches on google and google books turned up nothing. Likely hoax. --Soman (talk) 07:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.