Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anttonio Pereira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Anttonio Pereira

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hello, I'm an administrator on Wikipedia in Portuguese I selected this article for consensus elimination, for not seeing enough notoriety, only a person fulfilling their profession, the sources only attest that the person exists and worked in a mere short or developed illustration of books not acclaimed and little known even in Brazil. Analyzing the histories, I noticed that the article was created by the same user on the Wiki in Portuguese, Spanish and English. In Portuguese, the user has even created an article about the biographical studio on the Anttonio Pereira, which makes clear a probable conflict of interest. Evoking a cross-wiki spam Le Comte Edmond Dantès  msg 00:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of the citations in either English or Portuguese Wiki contains more than a mere mention of his name. I see nothing like the independent coverage needed to pass WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 01:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I notice that The Adventures of the Red Airplane (As Aventuras do Avião Vermelho), linked from Anttonio Pereira, does not mention him. Narky Blert (talk) 01:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This animated film is based on a book by a well-known author in Brazil, but the film does not even have an entry in the Portuguese Wikipedia. I did not find any quotes from the biography that links him to the participation of this film. Le Comte Edmond Dantès  msg 01:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Erico Verissimo looks WikiNotable, in all languages. I'm not so sure about the book pt:As Aventuras do Avião Vermelho for English Wiki; but IMO the film's fame is based only on that of the book. Narky Blert (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Exactly, the fact is that not one of the films that the biography participated like producer or director has notoriety or fame, as well as the books that illustrated. The attempt to spam wiki-cross is more than clear. Le Comte Edmond Dantès  msg 02:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The more I look at The Adventures of the Red Airplane, the more I think that that article should be about the book, with the film as a secondary topic. I'll sleep on it, and have another look. Narky Blert (talk) 03:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree with you. I did a research on the movie, You'll see mixed results, some about the movie, some about the book... Because the movie was based on the book, it gave some repercussion. But I did not find any quotes from the biographer. Which leads me to think that the participation of this is in production (behind the scenes). About the article "The Adventures of the Red Airplane", I would advise completing the article with information about the book (which is more relevant) and cite the movie in the form of a section, But I do not want to get into the merit of this, but the article about Anttonio Pereira. Thank you for your participation. Le Comte Edmond Dantès  msg 03:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi and . The creator of that article used English-language wikipedia to circumvent the  re-creation protection undetermined applied to this biography in losophone Wikipedia. For this he relied on the content translation tool.--Leon saudanha (talk) 22:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I believe that this attitude is worthy of blockage or other sanctions. Le Comte Edmond Dantès  msg 22:15, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah,for cross-wiki abuse--Leon saudanha (talk) 22:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Bilhauano (talk) 14:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bilhauano (talk) 14:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - well spotted; I agree with you. Comment - from my researches, I believe that the book The Adventures of the Red Airplane is indeed WikiNotable. It's only this attempt to inherit notability from the book and film by a non-notable person that I object to. Narky Blert (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  13:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of his supposed notability is based on WP:NOTINHERITED. No significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources to stabilish notability. It was deleted from Wikipedia in Portuguese Bilhauano (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment FWIW, the discussion in Spanish Wiki seems to be heading towards the same conclusion as in English and Lusophone Wikis. Narky Blert (talk) 01:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.