Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anu Emmanuel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Anu Emmanuel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article didn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Also her Film 'Action Hero Biju' is not yet released, its on the post-production process. So i need some editors suggestions whether it should be encyclopedic on Wikipedia or not. Josu4u (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 19:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 19:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's simply nothing better. Pinging past users, and .  SwisterTwister   talk  05:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks non-trivial support for notability.  red dogsix (talk) 15:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I originally tagged this for speedy as it claimed no significance. Unfortunately, subsequent edits have not gone on to establish general notability.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 15:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 09:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:BASIC, albeit on a weak level. Sources include:, , , . These sources were all added to the article after all of the delete !votes above, except for the last one directly above (see Revision history). North America1000 21:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * But the movie that mentioned in the references Action Hero Biju is not yet released, also i heard that it's on the post production works. And i believe that, the article fails WP:NACTOR.Josu4u (talk) 21:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable and they need not meet any other criteria. Although I've not check if the depth of coverage in the sources provided are substantial. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 21:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The support given is no more than trivial.  red dogsix (talk) 15:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Evaluation of the sources provided by NA1000 is needed. sst✈discuss 01:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, sst✈discuss 01:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  03:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 21:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The article in Malayala Manorama provides substantial coverage of the subject. The coverage in International Business Times, Sify, and Deccan Chronicle, when combined, provides several paragraphs of coverage about the subject. Per Notability (people), "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability." Cunard (talk) 21:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - An actor who has been active for less than five years almost always fails standards for notability. Ceosad (talk) 22:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.