Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anubhav Pratap Singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Anubhav Pratap Singh

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional self-creation. Fails GNG. Wareon (talk) 17:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Reason: eminent personality. First Food & Beverage Innovation Professor of BC. Senator to UBC - public political personality. Publication record. Emerging scientist. Multiple news articles present. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:79eb:9300:c0be:a57b:d9fc:f0a3 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC) — 2001:569:79eb:9300:c0be:a57b:d9fc:f0a3 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment. See also related Articles for deletion/Hosahalli Ramaswamy. —David Eppstein (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. With regards to NPROF C1, Singh is at the median for citing docs, publication number, and h-index among all coauthors with 10 or more publications. This does not suggest his work has had outsize impact on his field sufficient to meet C1. He's an early-career assistant prof who only graduated 5 years ago, so predictably the rest of the NPROF criteria are also deficient, and GNG clearly isn't met either. JoelleJay (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Citation record not yet strong enough for WP:PROF, and endowed assistant professorships do not pass #C5. Nothing else seems close. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article is somewhat promotional, and the subject does not have strong enough citations to pass PROF C1 or coverage to pass GNG.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.