Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuja Trehan Kapur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Anuja Trehan Kapur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article doesn't not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 10:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 July 30.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 10:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 10:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep bad faith nomination no reason given. Theroadislong (talk) 13:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:SKCRIT #1 - nominator has failed to advance any reason for deletion. <i style="background-color: Blue; color:#FFE">Hug</i>syrup 13:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep a rationale is now provided, but there is enough here to pass WP:BASIC. <i style="background-color: Blue; color:#FFE">Hug</i>syrup 07:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep no rationale/reason by the nominator. --Wario-Man (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Strikethrough my previous vote since the nominator has provided their rationale. I think she passes Notability (people) criteria. --Wario-Man (talk) 06:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment the nominator has now added a reason. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The nominator's rationale was in fact there all along. Uncle G (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 18:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - there are certainly issues with the text and some sources, but otherwise it checks out; she seems to be notable. Bearian (talk) 21:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject of this article meets notability criteria of WP:GNG. Article needs to be improved, not deleted. Netherzone (talk) 23:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable fails WP:GNG. Most of the sources fails WP:RS -- Harshil  want to talk? 03:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - subject meets WP:GNG and the article do need improvements but that is no reason for deletion.BabbaQ (talk) 15:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP Notability has been established with RSs. Lightburst (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.