Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anukul Gita


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Ixfd64 (talk) 07:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Anukul Gita

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declining db-spam since the article has been around 3.5 years ... which is really surprising, given the tone. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 22:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Irrecoverable spam/POV TurningWork (talk) 22:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  23:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 01:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Confucius, he say, "WP:Complete Bollocks will always attract deletion". Eddie.willers (talk) 02:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - wondering how on earth it survived for 3.5 years. Non-neutral and apparently non-notable. John Carter (talk) 13:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as spam. Edward321 (talk) 00:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G11 Yourname (talk) 02:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Clearly G11, should have been speedied when nominated. ukexpat (talk) 04:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.