Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A reasonable case was made for notability, but it did not carry the day as consensus formed around the idea that the subject failed WP:DIRECTOR and did not meet the GNG. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  18:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Anuram

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable director. Seems to have directed 2 movies, of which 1 seems barely notable. All the refs are about the movies, and none are about the person. Fails WP:GNG. (A lot of the editor's articles seems to be of questionable notability - WP:COI maybe)  Jupitus Smart  15:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  15:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  15:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  00:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:31, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - Director notability has always been a little unclear - it doesn't neatly fall into WP:DIRECTOR, but criterion 3 lines up with WP:NFILM criterion 1. In effect, any film that demonstrates its notability via multiple reviews also satisfies the requirements for director notability. Dum (2016 film) obviously meets this, as does the non-article film Kalyanism, using the references (review 1 & review 2). Either would technically be enough, and I believe between the two notability id demonstrated. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. DIRECTOR states "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work". Simply being reviewed does not qualify a film as "significant or well-known". Clarityfiend (talk) 06:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * 4c would also be a viable variant under that Nosebagbear (talk) 08:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Does not clearly violate notability guidelines, but the director isn't particularly significant either. &mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 00:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Clarityfiend. Fails WP:DIRECTOR. Also, IndiaGlitz and NowRunning are not RS. — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  09:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED (which makes the Nosebagbear's argument flawed). I don't see how he meets WP:GNG as there is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources of the subject himself. Instead the article relies on Kalyanism and Dum for references, where he is either present as a passing mention or not at all. Nothing in my searches either. It is simply WP:TOOSOON at this point. He may easily become notable at some point, but not now. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.