Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anushka Sharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nom essentially withdrwn. Remaining issues can be deal with via editing, not deletion. TravellingCari 03:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Anushka Sharma

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I PRODed this earlier, and even got it seconded, so I thought I have to follow through. Original reason: '''Not notable (yet); no sources. First paragraph copied from the article on the film.''' Endorsed by User:Ceyockey: "agree with deletion rationale. Alternative to deletion: redirect to Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi, tagging with R to list entry, thus treating this as an instance of WP:BLP1E". The editor who de-prodded it didn't explan why and didn't substantially improve the article.

I realise that we should WP:Give an article a chance, but there does seem to be a lot of bios on actors and artists whose single film or record hasn't even been released yet and might well become a career-changing flop. Magnus Holmgren (talk) 17:45, 6 September 2008 (UTC)}}


 * Delete: unsourced and GFDL violation that would require history copying to fix. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-06t18:04z
 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added, as required by the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 13:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * KEEP Found plenty of sources:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , and added them so the article might more easily be improved.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Splendid. I rescind my nomination for deletion, but the article still needs to be rewritten, especially since the second paragraph is copied from #10 there. — Magnus Holmgren (talk) 20:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. With the aditional sources, the copyvio will be easy to fix and the notability can be established from her pre-film carreer.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.