Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anzela Abbasi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Anzela Abbasi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib (talk) 06:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete notability isn't inherited; maybe WP:TOOSOON. samee  converse  23:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Will you please explain how, instead of just giving vote? 77.243.187.60 (talk) 17:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Not Delete Actress playing leading and supporting roles since two years (then how Too Soon)? She has 3 projects Gila, Baby and Main Haar Nahi Manoun Gi in which she appeared in main roles for which she passes WP:ENT, She also passes GNG by little margin considering  this source from reputed news The Express Tribune as well as this  from Business Recorder and others avail in article. Article is well sourced and every single information is verified by reputable source. 196.62.192.100 (talk) 16:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 10:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:TOOSOON. Passing mentions in press release are not significant coverage. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 10:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Actors career is equally important like significant coverage. What about multiple roles she has played? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.187.60 (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:The GNG and notability for actors as actor has to passed only one notability criteria whether GNG or NACTOR, She is passing WP:NACTOR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.187.60 (talk) 13:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:BIO.  scope_creep Talk  15:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin: None of the delete voters have made policy based arguments instead saying Fails Notability and its WP:TOO SOON without giving any explanations. 77.243.187.60 (talk) 17:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Note to closing admin: Sockpuppet investigations/Pakistanpedia. --Saqib (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * This doubts are already answered by experienced user here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/881237668 77.243.187.60 (talk) 10:43, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:NACTOR, with major roles in three blue-linked TV shows ("Has had significant roles in multiple notable .. television shows". RebeccaGreen (talk) 09:58, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've no idea why this has caused such dissension. It's a clear-cut satisfaction for WP:NACTOR criterion 1 as already noted. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.