Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ApNano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

ApNano

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Advertisement, marked since 1997 Truthbanks12345 (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Obvious Keep - A quick Gsearch indicates this company easily meets the general notability guidelines. I added a few references and cleaned up the article a tad. "marked since 1997" - Neat, this article is older than Wikipedia itself! — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  16:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete All of the google hits I looked at are press releases and other things written by the company itself. There's very little here that isn't marketing.  If someone pulls some real secondary coverage out of their hat that isn't a press release, then consider my vote changed to keep.  Beware there's a lot of "news article seeming" press releases in the results.  This company is very agressive in their marketing it seems. Gigs (talk) 18:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Question - And what would you say of the 4 sources I added to the article? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * They are still a little weak. I'll change to weak keep after looking closely at the IsraCast and World Tribune site, which appear to not be pure press releases. Gigs (talk) 19:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep IsraCast and World Tribune sources now in article are not too bad. Gigs (talk) 19:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I see no problem here, the article is sourced, and the subject is notable. --J.Mundo (talk) 12:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.