Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apache Bloodhound


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Trac. clpo13(talk) 19:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Apache Bloodhound

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable. There are no independent sources Mdggdj (talk) 11:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Trac. There's some extremely weak sourcing that I think might qualify a section there, but not enough to pass WP:SIGCOV for an independent article.   (yeah, press release posts, but at least have a couple sentences of analysis each...) A412 (Talk &bull; C) 22:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge to Trac. Not seeing the sourcing here. Suriname0 (talk) 06:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.