Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apadment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:35, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Apadment

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I can't find anything to suggest this is notable enough for an article. It is also an orphan, and reads more like an advert. Cloudbound (talk) 21:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: article is rather promotional in tone and I can't find anything that suggests that the subject is notable. Ducknish (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. Yaron K. (talk) 23:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to future article if notability arises. Thousands of new websites every day, this one  hasn't made it to notability yet.BennyHillbilly (talk) 06:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.