Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apeiron Island Hotel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:05, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Apeiron Island Hotel

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested endorsed PROD. Non-notable design concept with no proof that it will ever receive investors, much less ever be built. The article is referenced pretty much with blogs and sites regurgitating and discussing a press release. I cannot find any legitimate news outlets covering this hotel. Steamroller Assault (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  —Steamroller Assault (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  15:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reliable sources can exist before a project gets off the ground, so to speak - but that's not the case here. If the hotel isn't eventually built, but there are reliable sources that talk about why the failure is notable, then that might merit an article as well - or, more likely, mention in a parent company's article. Again, not the case here. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of verifiable notability. I was the prod-endorser. DMacks (talk) 03:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.