Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apeiruss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 22:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Apeiruss

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Who fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. not enough to establish notability music company or group. This music group seems to be too early in the concept phase for any such coverage to exist then it means WP:TOOSOON for this young singers group. As because they have worked with some famous singer that is Tahsan So, isn't means that they did won something or receive any an award. Even i didn't find any notable album in bangladesh. this article should be Deleted. Nahid Hossain (talk) 21:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment This is not a project I work on in any level of frequency, to an extent that I haven't yet developed an opinion toward delete or keep. I have done a bit of a search to find additional sources that may be usable in the article in some way here and here. It seems plausible to me that a half-decent Wiki article could be constructed from these sources and the sources already in the article, and I'd prefer a rescue rather than deletion. What prevents me from giving this a soft keep right now is that I have no reference for WP:RELIABILITY on these sources. They look less like press releases than other sites I did not list here, but ultimately that's the only judgment call I can make. he who am  are is myself  23:38, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Nahid Hossain (talk) 21:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as they have reliable sources newspaper coverage in the article and also in the Dhaka Tribune so there is no reason for deletion. Also they formed in 2014 so are well beyond the concept phase imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per User:Atlantic306 ((T)).- Nahal (T) 09:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.