Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apex and Bionic (AB)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.  bibliomaniac 1  5  01:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Apex and Bionic (AB)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The music duo fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. None of the sources cited in the article are independent of the subject. The duo's music has not been discussed in reliable sources. The page creator has created articles for non-notable figure in the past and this one isn't any different.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 20:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 20:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 20:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 20:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/ talk ¦ contribs \ 10:28, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — Subject(s) of article do not satisfy WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG individually or as a pair. Celestina007 (talk) 11:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.