Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apo Rodolfo Aguilar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 17:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Apo Rodolfo Aguilar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Tribal chief of a Philippine people with some 10,000. However, no reliable sources about him seem to exist, the most reliable is a tourist trip report on Total Travel. Related to the article HRH Prince Pinadu of Coron (which I also nominated for deletion), it had many of the same characteristics, with a truckload of titles, orders, ..., some self created, some given to him by obscure pseudo-royalty groups. Stripping all that away, we are left with what is supposedly (but unverifiably) someone who can be compared with the mayor of a 10,000 person village. Fails WP:BIO. He may be the same as the Rodolfo Aguilar mentioned here, which would be a single, short mention in a reliable source. Not sufficient to have an article though. Fram (talk) 09:23, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. If he was an elected politician of a town of 10,000 in the Philippines he would fail WP:POLITICIAN.  The fact that he has an absurd number of self-appointed titles does not improve that notability, however much more colourful it may make him appear.  Article is in appalling shape too. --Legis (talk - contribs) 05:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nom's findings.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.