Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ApolloGesCom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

ApolloGesCom

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Removed PROD - PROD reason was non-notable software, reason for PROD removal (as given on Talk page) was not a policy-based reason and was inadequate. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies, but I've only had time to do a cursory bit of WP:BEFORE so far, and with sources being in Spanish I can't really tell if they're any good - but I thought it best not to just accept the contest PROD and to bring it here so some more eyes can be cast on it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

I am a bit puzzled. Just add an image, and more sources who claimed the relevance encyclopedic article that already existed. I can not find a reason to be nominated for deletion. Of course, thank you very much. --Fedenico (talk) 14:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Advertisement for a comprehensive business management software.  No showing that this product has historical, technical, or cultural significance or long term historical notability; it's one of many similar products.  Neither Google News Archive, Books, or Scholar have ever heard of it in any language, either in the original form or as "Apollo GesCom". - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:VSCA, that is WP:NOTGUIDE, lack of independent reliable secondary sources and advertising: (screenshot: http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/4222/apollow.jpg ). If you don't understand Spanish, they had an article on their website celebrating that they were on Wikipedia. Algébrico (talk) 16:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  —Algébrico (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment It was speedy deleted from Wikipedia in Spanish as advertisement and there is an Afd on Wikipedia in Portuguese. Algébrico (talk) 16:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.