Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollogic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Apollogic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As far as I can tell, this fails notability of WP:CORP pretty badly; I see no significant coverage by reliable sources of any kind in the article. I prodded this a while back, I see it was deprodded by the creator without any comment (the creator has not written on anything else). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 21:47, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gongshow  Talk 07:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Promotional article, no significant coverage by reliable secondary sources. A search for news articles doesn't bring up anything. The citations listed in the article (self-published sources, press releases, user-generated wikis) are considered unreliable. Fails the general notability criteria.-- xanchester  (t)  09:12, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Searched for news and websites and came up with absolutely nothing aside from the company's own website and related publicity. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. --Batard0 (talk) 09:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.