Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollyon (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   userfy. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Apollyon (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability; a google search finds just two hits outside Wikipedia. Prod removed but this concern was not addressed. PC78 (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)\
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 22:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy WP:CRYSTAL. No doubt will be notable when released so allow the author to hold onto it until then. Drawn Some (talk) 23:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Utterly bizarre entry; not since I marked student papers have I seen an utter lack of information stretched out to maximum length. Hairhorn (talk) 03:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Go patrol new pages for a while. It'll blow your mind. Shadowjams (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy or Weak keep - It's got a Finnish language wiki page: Apollyon (elokuva); most of the sources I found were Finnish as well. I think it's actually a viable improvement candidate, although I might want to see some sources. Userfy is fine too, and it can be reintroduced when the release related media provides WP:RS. Shadowjams (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per this and request input from Finnish wikipedians who would be better able to search and translate sources. It can always be returned to AfD if such is not forthcoming.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as most of this article information has been written from reference #3 "Satakunnan Kansa, Virta - magazine, issue #20, 15.5.2009". This is apparently a weekly magazine and it was in net for a while but has since been refreshed with a new weekly issue. - FinFilmBiz —Preceding unsigned comment added by FinFilmBiz (talk • contribs) 23:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Userfy. An article in the local press is not enough to keep. Btw, FinFilmBiz is a single-purpose account. Fences and windows (talk) 00:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.