Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apoquindo massacre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Apoquindo massacre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphan article, Google search only provides mirror sites. Non notable incident. Nordic  Dragon  12:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  13:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Keep. Nominator doesn't state why the article isn't notable. In fact, there are plenty of sources in Chilean newspapers cited. Being orphan isn't a reason in itself for deletion. Fiachra10003 (talk) 22:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I think the difficulty may be that the nominator was only WP:GOOGLETESTing in the English language. If you search under the Spanish term "baleo de Apoquindo", for instance, you will find many primary sources discussing the incident. Fiachra10003 (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I added a number of further sources. There's little in English but the massacre has clearly become a cause celebre in Chile because the 20th anniversary of the attack produced a wave of articles in the major Chilean press.  Fiachra10003 (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep thanks to WP:HEY by User:Fiachra10003, and, of course, that it truly was a major big deal event.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - per faulty reasonings for deletion. per improvements made. BabbaQ (talk) 10:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.