Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apostolos Varnavas (Kato Polemidia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  22:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Apostolos Varnavas (Kato Polemidia)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Poorly sourced article which fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 13:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 13:46, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi I am new to Wikipedia, not sure where to add this info. I have just added a government source for Apostolos Varnavas area which clearly states it has its own Mucktar (local administrator) under the general area of Polemidia municipality. Thank you Yorgoswikiluv (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Update 12/01/2021, dear Cupper52 , if the article fails WP:NPLACE how comes it already is accepted in Greek version? Is it possible then that a topic/article can exist in one language and be legitimate there, but not acceptible in another language in wikipedia? Thank you for any clarifications Yorgoswikiluv (talk) 02:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Different language wikis are independent and can (and do) have different rules. ~EdGl talk 21:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

To Tagishsimon who rejected the appeal I did after adding a government site source, I would like to discuss why he did not mention that I found a source. Does he /she think the source is not good enough. If so let me know. Im very happy to discuss. Yorgoswikiluv (talk) 02:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not sourced adequetely. CAVETOWNFAN (talk) 20:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete – while WP:GEOLAND says, "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable", they must also meet WP:GNG and there is no significant coverage – the one source cited (in Greek, see WP:NONENG) appears to be no more than a list and not an independent article about the area - Epinoia (talk) 16:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.