Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appadurai Muttulingam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 14:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Appadurai Muttulingam
This article was recreated after it was deleted on a previous AFD. Not notable. Has a bunch books that never sold. - Ganeshk  ( talk ) 06:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Please note that less than 1 % Tamil literature is available in net and because many of those are not with Unicode, that may not come up in Google Search. As an author of books which are available in Amazon, this article has to be kept Doctor Bruno 17:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete only 77 Google hits, many referring to this article. Seems to be vanity or promotional.  The results of the previous AfD apply. AdamBiswanger1 06:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per AdamBiswanger1.  Kala  ni [talk] 06:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Is it necessary for books to sell in order for someone to count as notable enough for Wikpedia? The charge in the archived articles that the book on Macros was from a subsidy press diminished the claims of notability for that volume, but what about the others? Standards for professors is that their publication exceeds that of the average prof at a university, right? There's no real requirement that people read the books they publish. This man isn't a prof, but he seems to have published a number of books in Tamil fiction. I'm not familiar with either him or his books and haven't read any Tamil literature in 15 years, but just judging in terms of the article, it seems NPOV and sufficiently notable for a keep. Inter lingua  talk 06:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete mindful of systemic bias, maybe the lack of google hits is due to searching using the Roman alphabet and/or searching with one of several possible spellings. But the fact that it was originally a vanity article and the list of publications is shaky (marginal vanity, little readership) makes me lean toward delete. Change to a keep if someone familiar with Tamil literature thinks this guy is notable. Opabinia regalis 07:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. "அ.முத்துலிங்கம்" gives 39 unique Google hits, which may not seem a lot, but Tamil is not strongly represented on the Internet. The article should be merged with A. Muttulingam (which I don't think was created as a vanity article); this may actually be the more common search term. There is also the spelling "A. Muthulingam", as he was referred to in the section "Famous contemporary authors" in the article Tamil literature until the whole section was deleted in this edit: ; see also e.g. the last entry on this page: . And finally, you can also spell "A. Muththulingam". --Lambiam Talk 08:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Books seem verifiable e.g., . Probable systemic bias issues here. And no, I can't spell his name but Tamil-speakers may be able to.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  09:13, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment It seems that this article and A. Muttulingam are both about User:Amuttu (who only contributes in Tamil; see his talk page). 145.222.138.134 09:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lambian and Dlyons493; searching for Muttulingam and checking the English results closely finds several references which suggest the subject is considered a notable (and probably popular) Tamil-language author. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but... A. Muttulingam neeeds to be merged with this article. In addition, vanity elements such as the jobs of his children and the praise of his writing style need to be removed. Some minor references to the writer can be found in The Hindu newspaper here Bwithh 14:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but merge with A. Muttulingam and clean up. - Parthi 20:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I own a couple of his books, and I can confirm that he's a well known short story author - for example, this archive features his works (Nos. 46, 47, 85, 86, 87, and 132 are by him). If I remember right, he's even won a couple of literary awards.  -- Arvind 00:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * And in case there are still any doubts about his notability, the Tamil wikipedia has an article about him: see ta:அ. முத்துலிங்கம். -- Arvind 01:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I've cleaned up the article - hopefully this is sufficient to get it through this VfD -- Arvind 02:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. per above -- published author of a number of books. ImpuMozhi 01:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable within the Tamil language community. Eluchil404 01:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please it is notabel and verifiable too Yuckfoo 06:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.