Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ApparelnBags


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 04:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

ApparelnBags

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Really close to being speedy for G11. agt x 18:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 19:50, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 19:50, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per A7, G11. The "sources" are just spam profiles for the company on various websites (even academia.edu, how novel!). Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 06:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable for an article with my searches finding nothing good. SwisterTwister   talk  06:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above editors. I did a large overhaul on the article and I don't even think that was nearly enough. Simply not notable. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I have also gone ahead and nominated it for G11. No reason for this AfD in my opinion. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, with an argument echoing Qwertyus. I'd support expediting the AfD but not speedy delete as such—it doesn't currently meet the G11 criterion. Disclosure: acting as an admin, I've removed the speedy deletion template from the article. {&#123; Nihiltres &#8202;&#124;talk&#8202;&#124;edits}&#125; 03:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.